00:07
The work environment is changing as a result
of digitization.
00:11
Teamwork appears to be very different today
than it did many years ago.
00:15
What we'll talk about now is how teamwork
will appear in the future.
00:20
People used to have a silo mentality.
00:23
Today, this is shifting more and more to the
classic department mindset, which is already
somewhat antiquated - together, we are
strong.
00:33
In the past, the motto was "divide and
conquer," therefore I would divide first if I
was confident that doing so would allow me
to conquer later.
00:43
Today, this appears to be extremely
different; today, I divide to learn.
00:49
That means I can only get smarter and learn
through interactions.
00:52
You used to keep the knowledge to yourself,
but now you share it to connect it, network
it, and truly grasp it.
00:59
That is the difference in a world that is
constantly changing, and it is the only way
to even generate new ideas.
01:06
At one point, Siemens commented, "If Siemens
only knew what Siemens really knows." So you
have a large corporation, and somewhere
there is knowledge, but we don't know where
it is, and the same is true for you.
01:20
If you share your knowledge and collaborate
with others, you may one day sit in your
living room and think to yourself, "Gosh, if
only I had realized that I knew that." More
and more organizations can make a certain
department's knowledge available to other
departments. And it is through this process
that these organizations are able to progress
from a knowledge organization to an
innovative and creative organization.
01:53
Everything is interconnected, and we are
producing rather than simply knowing, which
is novel and also related to the following
debate, which is whether we still need a
hierarchy or if the hierarchy has become
obsolete.
02:08
And we currently have a very binary debate
in which you may say "Yes" or "This is my
personal opinion." The truth is somewhere in
the center; it is gray, and neither having a
hierarchy nor not having a hierarchy is the
only option.
02:25
And there is currently an example, a case,
that of Daimler AG, the world's largest
automobile company. They stated, "Gosh, we
need to reevaluate our organization and seek
out fresh perspectives on it." And they
basically said, "Okay, within five years, 20%
of our organization and 20% of our workforce
will operate as swarm organizations." That
is, there is no traditional hierarchy with
the CEO, a department manager, a junior
manager, a team leader, and so on.
02:59
This may have a somewhat different name in
other companies, but the premise is the same:
you have a swarm organization.
03:07
Everyone is on the same level; they speak
with one another, coordinate among
themselves, and formulate their own plans -
they are much faster in smaller units.
03:17
There is no large planning process, but
rather flexible control of processes,
automatism, and this results in radically
different work outputs, and clearly, the
manufacture of an E-Class car will still be
done hierarchically.
03:32
That is something you say, "This has to be
that way," but in other departments -
marketing, sales - we're increasingly seeing
swarm organizations, and there are examples
of how you can respond to this
transformation in the digital age.
03:47
This is one example of how agility can be
used instead of hierarchy.
03:53
The overarching goal is to become an
ambidextrous company, which is a dreadful
word that business administration has taught
us.
04:03
In a nutshell, the premise is that the
economy has been heavily focused on
efficiency in recent decades.
04:11
You would save five minutes here, three
cents here, and twenty cents there, and that
was the goal, and you didn't place too much
emphasis on innovation or momentum.
04:23
However, in an ever-changing environment,
digitalization as the primary driver must
become more innovative.
04:31
At the same time, it must be as efficient and
effective in the former areas where you
excelled. That means you need to be able to
play the piano in some ways - you need
ambidexterity at the piano, efficiency and
invention, and a 50/50 focus.
04:50
However, the output must be 100 per cent,
and this is the major problem - this is what
the firms are attempting to achieve through
various means.
05:00
Corporations are saying, "Whoa, we're
hierarchical, and this whole swarm
organization thing is impossible for us." We
are also quite efficient, and when it comes
to innovation, we buy or invest in start-ups
and strive to send miniature speedboats into
the oceans to seek new places." Others, on
the other hand, are secret champions, world
leaders that no one knows about; they are
experimenting with collaborations or building
small individual enterprises that generate
new business models.
05:31
So there are various techniques to becoming
an ambidextrous organization.
05:35
Consider what is the best-case scenario for
your organization or yourself.
05:52
In this day and age, it's also important to
consider how you lead a team, and the command
and control world is likely coming to an
end.
06:04
This command-and-obey mindset of "you have
to do this by tomorrow morning; otherwise,
you get the whip" can still be seen
occasionally, but not anymore.
06:15
Employees protest, saying, "No, we don't
want this." Employees want to be led
differently; they want to be regarded as
equals, to be given more flexibility, and to
have opportunities to be creative and
develop.
06:36
That is not what Human Resources is about;
it is simply a resource.
06:40
Instead, in today's world, it may be the
most valuable resource.
06:44
The individual - the employee - is the
emphasis; they are allowed to change, and
perhaps even needs to, and when you hear
that as a manager, you can argue, "Yes, but
that's how it's always been done." And,
sure, it is correct, and it is changing.
07:00
And that's what McGregor said almost a
half-century ago when he established Theory X
Y. He stated that the way we perceive
individuals is how we get these people.
07:10
Theory X essentially implies that you have
this fundamental premise that individuals or
employees are lazy, don't want to work, and
only have negative intentions.
07:20
And once you have this basic assumption, you
instantly develop laws, sanctions, and
punishments - you crack the whip, and the
employee simply withdraws.
07:30
They avoid making mistakes and are quite
passive.
07:33
They don't take the initiative - they don't
take responsibility - which validates my
primary assumption.
07:40
Theory Y, on the other hand, has an entirely
different perspective on individuals.
07:45
It states that a person wants something -,
an employee wants to work, they are good for
us, they are creative, and you offer them
room to develop; then they may utilize this
freedom to evolve, take the initiative,
assume responsibility, be creative, and
innovative. That is extremely crucial.
08:07
That also reinforces the fundamental
assumption, therefore we have a
self-fulfilling prophecy.
08:13
This is how I see my employees; that's how I
get them, and it's actually a very
interesting learning experience.
08:22
The manager of the future may accomplish a
great deal.
08:25
They are a coach, a trainer, a mentor, an
enabler, and a creator - and the manager is a
generalist rather than a specialist who
networks across organizational boundaries.
08:36
There is a great deal of empathy, as well as
vision and efficiency.
08:41
We could call him the ambidextrous manager.
08:45
And now comes the key question: how do teams
function?
You could say it is becoming virtual rather
than live.
08:53
We all have a smartphone and a laptop - we
have modern instruments that allow us to
achieve ultra-fast connection, which means
we can speak with Japan, Asia, the United
States, North and South America - all on a
time-delayed basis.
09:08
We have knowledge interchange across
countries and real-time issue solutions -
everything is becoming international, and
language and cultural barriers will be
substantially reduced when English becomes
the official language for everyone.
09:24
We will interact in English, and if you
don't speak it well, the AI will assist you,
and we will occasionally converse in two
other languages that aren't English or
another significant foreign language.
09:37
Instead, someone in India may chat in his
own language with someone in South Africa,
and the AI would interpret.